Os Novos litígios climáticos (e o discurso dos Direitos Humanos)
Resumo
O impacto das alterações climáticas no ambiente e no ser humano põe em causa um vasto leque de direitos fundamentais protegidos tanto nacional como internacionalmente. A litigância climática é mais um instrumento para forçar a acção climática e a reparação de danos. Nos últimos tempos, observa-se uma tendência para acrescentar uma narrativa climática de violação de Direitos Humanos. Neste artigo procura-se, assim, explorar as vantagens e desvantagens desta abordagem e analisar a jurisprudência mais significativa nesta matéria para reflectir se este é o melhor caminho.
Referências
ADLER, Dena. US climate change litigation in the age of Trump: Year two, Sabin Centre for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law Schoo, 2019. Disponível em <http://columbiaclimatelaw.com/files/2019/06/Adler-2019-06-US-Climate- ChangeLitigation-in-Age-of-Trump-Year-2-Report.pdf >
ALLEN, Miles. Liability for Climate Change: Will It ever Be Possible to Sue Anyone for Damaging the Climate?, Nature, Vol. 421, 892, 2003.
AVERILL, Marilyn. Linking climate litigation and human rights, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 2009.
BAERE. Geert de; RYNGAERT, Cedric. The ECJ’s Judgment in Air Transport Association of America and the International Legal Context of the EU’s Climate Change Policy, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 18, n.º 3, 2013.
BÄHR, Cordelia Christiane et al. KlimaSeniorinnen: lessons from the Swiss senior women’s case for future climate litigation, Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, Vol. 9, n.º 2, 2018.
BLUMM, Michael C.; WOOD, Mary Christina. No Ordinary Lawsuit: Climate Change, Due Process, and the Public Trust Doctrine, American University Law Review, Vol. 67, n.º 1, 2017.
BOUWER, Kim. The unsexy future of climate change litigation, Journal of Environmental Law, 2018.
BRADFORD, C. Mank. Standing on Global Warming: Is Injury to All Injury to None?, Environmental Law, Vol. 35, n.º 1, 2005.
BRIDGEMAN, Natalie L. Human Rights under the ATCA as a Proxy for Environmental Claims, Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, Vol 6, nº 1, 35-36, 2003.
COLOMBO, Esmeralda Colombo. Enforcing International Climate Change Law in Domestic Courts: A New Trend of Cases for Boosting Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration, UCLA, Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 35, n.º 1,
-102, 2017.
EBEKU, Kaniye S. A. Constitutional right to a healthy environment and human rights approaches to environmental protection in Nigeria: Gbemre v. Shell revisited, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Vol. 16, n.º 3, 2007.
FERREIRA, Patrícia G. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in the National Courts: Lessons from Urgenda v. The Netherlands, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 5, n.º 2, 2016.
FISHER, Elizabeth. Climate Change Litigation, Obsession and Expertise: Reflecting on the Scholarly Response to Massachusetts v. EPA, Law & Policy, Vol. 35, n.º 3, 2013.
GATMAYTAN, Dante B. The Illusion of Intergenerational Equity: Oposa v. Factoran as Pyrrhic Victory, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Primavera, 2003.
GOLDBERG, Daniel. Global Warming and Human Rights, Testimony before IACHR, CIEL, 2007.
GROSSMAN, David A. Warming Up to a not-so-Radical Idea: Tort-Based Climate Change Litigation, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 28, 2003.
HAVEL, B.; MULLIGAN, J. The Triumph of Politics: Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union Validating the Inclusion of Non‐EU Airlines in the Emissions Trading Scheme, Air and Space Law, Vol. 37, n.º 3, 2012.
HOUK, Oliver A. Light from the Trees: The Story of Minors Oposa and the Russian Forest Cases, Bepress Legal Series, Paper n.º 1641, 2006.
HUNTER, David B. The Implications of Climate Change Litigation for International Environmental Law-Making, Washington College of Law Research Paper n.º 2008-14, 5-8.
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY. Climate change and Human Rights: a rough guide. ICHR. Versoix, 2., 2008.
KOZIEL, T. (2012). Extraterritorial Application of EU Environmental Law – Implications of the ECJ’s Judgment in Air Transport Association of America, The Columbia Journal of European Law Online, 2012.
LEIJTEN, Ingrid Leijten. Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2019.
LIN, Jolene Lin. Climate Change and the Courts, Legal Studies, Vol. 32, n.º 1, 2012.
MARKELL, David Markell; RUHL, J. B. An Empirical Assessment of Climate Change in the Courts: A New Jurisprudence or Business as Usual?, Florida Law Review, Vol. 64, n.º 1, 2012.
McCORMICK, Sabrina. McCormick et al. Strategies in and outcomes of climate change litigation in the United States, Nature Climate Change 8, 2019, 829–833.
MILLS, Meryl Eschen. The Global Warming Case: Massachussets v. EPA, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, Vol. VII, n.º 2, 2007.
NORDHAUS, William D. The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World. Yale University Press, 2013.
________. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming, The MIT Press 2013.
________. An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases, Science, n.º 258, 1992.
_________. Reflections on the economics of climate change, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, n.º 4, 1992.
OSOFSKY, Hari M. Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, American Indian Law Review, Vol. 31, 2007.
OSOFSKY, M. The Continuing Importance of Climate Change Litigation, Climate Law, n.º 1, : 3-29, 2010.
________. The Geography of Climate Change Litigation: Implications for Transnational Regulatory Governance, Washington University Law Review, Vol. 83, n.º 6, 1835-1838, 2005.
PEEL, Jacqueline; OSOFSKY, H. M. A rights turn in climate change litigation?, Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 7, n.º 1, 2008.
________. Climate Change Litigation’s Regulatory Pathways: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Australia, Law & Policy, Vo. 35, n.º 3, 2013.
PEEL, Jacqueline; JIN, Jolene Lin. Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 113, n.º 3, 2019.
POSNER, Eric A. (2007). Climate Change and International Human Rights Litigation: A Critical Appraisal, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper n.º 329, University of Chicago, Chicago.
SACHS, Wolfgang. Climate Change and Human Rights, Interactions between Global Change and Human Health, Scripta Varia n.º 106, Vatican, 2006.
SARAIVA, Rute Neto Cabrita e Gil. A herança de Quioto em clima de incerteza: análise jurídico-económica do mercado de emissões num quadro de desenvolvimento sustentado. Tese de doutoramento. Lisboa: Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 2009
SETZER, Joana; BYRNES, Rebecca. Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot, Policy report, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Londres, 1, 35, 2019.
SIERRA, S. A. (2019). The Colombian government has failed to fulfill the Supreme Court’s landmark order to protect the Amazon, Dejusticial, 2019. Disponível em <https://www.dejusticia.org/en/the-colombiangovernment-has-failed-to-fulfill-the- supreme-courts-landmark-order-to-protect-the-amazon/ >
STRAUSS, A. L. The Legal Option: Suing the United States in International Forums for Global Warming Emissions, Environmental Law Reporter, n.º 33, 2003.
VARVASTIAN, S. (2019); PRESTON, Brian J. (2016). The Contribution of the Courts in Tackling Climate Change, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 28, n.º 1, 11, 2019.
______. The Human Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment in Climate Change Litigation, MPIL Research Paper Series n.º 2019-09, 7, 2019.
WAGNER, M. M. Global Warming and Human Rights, Testimony before IACHR, Earthjustice, 2007a.
WATT-CLOUTIER, Sheila. Global Warming and Human Rights, IACHR & CIEL, 2007.
WOOD, Mary Christina; WOODWARD, Charles W. Woodward IV. Atmospheric Trust Litigation and the Constitutional Right to a Healthy Climate System: Judicial Recognition at Last, Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, Vol. 6, n.º 2, 2016.
